Archive for

The Sundays of Satin-Legs Smith

February 24th, 2007 by Mike

This is one of my favorite poems of all time.

The Sundays of Satin-Legs Smith
by Gwendolyn Brooks

Inamoratas, with an approbation,
Bestowed his title. Blessed his inclination.

He wakes, unwinds, elaborately: a cat
Tawny, reluctant, royal. He is fat
And fine this morning. Definite. Reimbursed.

He waits a moment, he designs his reign,
That no performance may be plain or vain.
Then rises in a clear delirium.

He sheds, with his pajamas, shabby days.
And his desertedness, his intricate fear, the
Postponed resentments and the prim precautions.

Now, at his bath, would you deny him lavender
Or take away the power of his pine?
What smelly substitute, heady as wine,
Would you provide? life must be aromatic.
There must be scent, somehow there must be some.
Would you have flowers in his life? suggest
Asters? a Really Good geranium?
A white carnation? would you prescribe a Show
With the cold lilies, formal chrysanthemum
Magnificence, poinsettias, and emphatic
Red of prize roses? might his happiest
Alternative (you muse) be, after all,
A bit of gentle garden in the best
Of taste and straight tradition? Maybe so.
But you forget, or did you ever know,
His heritage of cabbage and pigtails,
Old intimacy with alleys, garbage pails,
Down in the deep (but always beautiful) South
Where roses blush their blithest (it is said)
And sweet magnolias put Chanel to shame.

No! He has not a flower to his name.
Except a feather one, for his lapel.
Apart from that, if he should think of flowers
It is in terms of dandelions or death.
Ah, there is little hope. You might as well—
Unless you care to set the world a-boil
And do a lot of equalizing things,
Remove a little ermine, say, from kings,
Shake hands with paupers and appoint them men,
For instance—certainly you might as well
Leave him his lotion, lavender and oil.

Let us proceed. Let us inspect, together
With his meticulous and serious love,
The innards of this closet. Which is a vault
Whose glory is not diamonds, not pearls,
Not silver plate with just enough dull shine.
But wonder-suits in yellow and in wine,
Sarcastic green and zebra-striped cobalt.
With shoulder padding that is wide
And cocky and determined as his pride;
Ballooning pants that taper off to ends
Scheduled to choke precisely.
                                                Here are hats
Like bright umbrellas; and hysterical ties
Like narrow banners for some gathering war.

People are so in need, in need of help.
People want so much that they do not know.

Below the tinkling trade of little coins
The gold impulse not possible to show
Or spend. Promise piled over and betrayed.

These kneaded limbs receive the kiss of silk.
Then they receive the brave and beautiful
Embrace of some of that equivocal wool.
He looks into his mirror, loves himself—
The neat curve here; the angularity
That is appropriate at just its place;
The technique of a variegated grace.

Here is all his sculpture and his art
And all his architectural design.
Perhaps you would prefer to this a fine
Value of marble, complicated stone.
Would have him think with horror of baroque,
Rococo. You forget and you forget.

He dances down the hotel steps that keep
Remnants of last night’s high life and distress.
As spat-out purchased kisses and spilled beer.
He swallows sunshine with a secret yelp.
Passes to coffee and a roll or two.
Has breakfasted.
                         Out. Sounds about him smear,
Become a unit. He hears and does not hear
The alarm clock meddling in somebody’s sleep;
Children’s governed Sunday happiness;
The dry tone of a plane; a woman’s oath;
Consumption’s spiritless expectoration;
An indignant robin’s resolute donation
Pinching a track through apathy and din;
Restaurant vendors weeping; and the L
That comes on like a slightly horrible thought.

Pictures, too, as usual, are blurred.
He sees and does not see the broken windows
Hiding their shame with newsprint; little girl
With ribbons decking wornness, little boy
Wearing the trousers with the decentest patch,
To honor Sunday; women on their way
From “service,” temperate holiness arranged
Ably on asking faces; men estranged
From music and from wonder and from joy
But far familiar with the guiding awe
Of foodlessness.
                            He loiters.
                                              Restaurant vendors
Weep, or out of them rolls a restless glee.
The Lonesome Blues, the Long-lost Blues, I Want A
Big Fat Mama. Down these sore avenues
Comes no Saint-Saëns, no piquant elusive Grieg,
And not Tschaikovsky’s wayward eloquence
And not the shapely tender drift of Brahms.
But could he love them? Since a man must bring
To music what his mother spanked him for
When he was two: bits of forgotten hate,
Devotion: whether or not his mattress hurts:
The little dream his father humored: the thing
His sister did for money: what he ate
For breakfast—and for dinner twenty years
Ago last autumn: all his skipped desserts.

The pasts of his ancestors lean against
Him. Crowd him. Fog out his identity.
Hundreds of hungers mingle with his own,
Hundreds of voices advise so dexterously
He quite considers his reactions his,
Judges he walks most powerfully alone,
That everything is—simply what it is.

But movie-time approaches, time to boo
The hero’s kiss, and boo the heroine
Whose ivory and yellow it is sin
For his eye to eat of. The Mickey Mouse,
However, is for everyone in the house.

Squires his lady to dinner at Joe’s Eats.
His lady alters as to leg and eye,
Thickness and height, such minor points as these,
From Sunday to Sunday. But no matter what
Her name or body positively she’s
In Queen Lace stockings with ambitious heels

That strain to kiss the calves, and vivid shoes
Frontless and backless, Chinese fingernails,
Earrings, three layers of lipstick, intense hat
Dripping with the most voluble of veils.
Her affable extremes are like sweet bombs
About him, whom no middle grace or good
Could gratify. He had no education
In quiet arts of compromise. He would
Not understand your counsels on control, nor
Thank you for your late trouble.
                                                    At Joe’s Eats
You get your fish or chicken on meat platters.
With coleslaw, macaroni, candied sweets,
Coffee and apple pie. You go out full.
(The end is—isn’t it?—all that really matters.)

                          And even and intrepid come
                          The tender boots of night to home.

                          Her body is like new brown bread
                          Under the Woolworth mignonette.
                          Her body is a honey bowl
                          Whose waiting honey is deep and hot,
                          Her body is like summer earth,
                          Receptive, soft, and absolute …

Bjork

February 13th, 2007 by Mike

I haven’t been one for music videos since the mid 80s when my momma turned off MTV one day after she came home and my brother and I were watching MTV Spring Break (I think it had something to do with all of the women in bikinis).

Thanks to my friends Quy and Tony I have been recently introduced to Bjork’s Volumen, a DVD of 14 of her videos. They are nearly all excellent, mini movies really. However, special attention must be paid to the handful of videos directed by Michel Gondry of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Chappelle Block Party fame. His videos on this collection are simply stunning. Spike Jonze takes his turn on this DVD as well.

One video missing from this DVD is the award winning video for All Is Full Of Love directed by Chris Cunnigham. Check it out.

A different type of usability

February 6th, 2007 by Mike

Officials at Heathrow Airport calculated that as the population grew older it would need to install more bathrooms. They made this decision by noticing that older folks went to the bathroom more often than their younger counterparts.

Turns out the old folks were going to the bathroom to hear their flight announcements!

via Ballpark

Photographs from Bruce Davidson’s Book - Subway

February 6th, 2007 by Mike

I am currently in love with Bruce Davidson’s photos from the old New York City Subway (you know, the one with graffiti inside the trains and really big hair).

I love the old school subway map in the first photo. Visit the entire series, and be sure to spend some time with the East 100th Street series.

Super Bowl XLI = Prince Concert

February 5th, 2007 by Mike

I will, from here on out, be referring to this year’s Super Bowl as the “Prince Concert.”

Besides the fact that he absolutely smoked that guitar, the man closed out with Purple Rain… in the rain.

The best “Prince Concert” commercial was of course the Doritos commercial (closely followed by the Grand Theft Auto Coca-Cola commercial).

OddCast - Using a MBA as a Proxy For What?

February 2nd, 2007 by Mike

Charlie O’Donnell recently noted that his company, OddCast, is posting an employment opportunity with the following disclaimer:

An MBA is not only not required, it is frowned upon.

I immediately nodded in recognition when reading his post because I privately harbored the same feeling when I worked in startups. My experience instructed me that MBAs were particularly well suited for finding and defining problems (a useful skill). They were less than amazing at solving them (a much more useful skill). Of course, like all stereotypes, this is not always true. I count several MBAs in my group of friends who are smarter, and better problem solvers than I will ever hope to be.

But I quickly realized that OddCast’s endeavor is misguided.

I assume that OddCast is using an MBA as a proxy here for some underlying character traits that it would like to avoid in a candidate. Of course my point is moot if OddCast is merely using the MBA to weed out over qualified candidates. For instance, if the position was for an administrative assistant, noting that having an MBA is frowned upon would be rational, if not obvious.

I think the job posting is misguided for several reasons:

First, the obvious point. I am not sure that an MBA is an accurate enough proxy. I know for a fact that although some general statements can be made about business school (or law school) education, no such statements can be made about all of the people that choose to attend such schools. People are always surprised to hear that I am a lawyer. I don’t fit the stereotype (for several reasons).

Secondly, a simple balancing test (sorry, alas, I am a lawyer) reveals that any marginal amount of time saved not having to interview MBAs that were discouraged from applying can’t be worth not meeting even one perfect candidate.

At this stage in OddCast’s early life, every member of the team counts. Immensely. Making a significant hiring mistake can make or break a business. But there are really two types of hiring mistakes and I argue that the one OddCast is making is the greater of the two.

Hiring the wrong person for a position can be devastating to a startup. The time it takes to realize that an employee is underperforming is time that startups frankly can’t afford to lose. However, if a candidate is underperforming, at least you can recognize that fact, and hopefully, correct it.

Worse, I think, is the employee that is merely meeting targets who was choosen over a potential hire that would have blown the top off of expectations. I believe this situation to be worse because you can’t correct for this mistake - because you don’t know that you have made it. There are no indicators. The person you hired is doing as expected. And the person you didn’t hire is off making another company more successful.

I am not advocating that one should make the perfect the enemy of the good. We would never make hiring decisions if we waited to make sure we had seen every candidate. But, I think it is a mistake to intentionally limit the pool of qualified applicants at the pre-application stage. There is no good reason for discouraging an entire class of people from applying in an attempt to avoid a certain character trait. Tweak the interview process to detect for the trait you want to avoid. If you really feel that you are losing valuable time interviewing poor candidates develop a pre-screening process to better match candidates with opportunities. Both of these options will be more accurate while leaving you open to meeting the candidate who can help take your business to the next level, and who might (despite his talent) have an MBA.

Update: Another interesting point just crossed my mind. Because there is no context, it is unclear whether OddCast’s disdain for MBAs is particular to this current opening. If it is, what happens when they need an MBA to fill an unrelated position? This would likely happen when it needs to bring in a more seasoned executive, one who might very well have an MBA.